On Tuesday, a landmark judgment was delivered by Hon. Justice Liman at the Federal High Court in Lagos, bringing an end to years of legal battle between Honeywell Flour Mills Plc (HFMP) and Ecobank Nigeria.
In a thorough and meticulous evaluation of the arguments presented by both parties, Hon. Justice Liman carefully considered the issues at hand and subsequently granted all the reliefs sought by HFMP.
According to The Nation, the court’s ruling came as a resounding victory for the plaintiff, Honeywell Flour Mills, while dismissing Ecobank’s counterclaim.
The crux of the case revolved around a matter where HFMP was denied access to funds in its account due to an ex parte order that had been granted in favor of Ecobank.
With an astute understanding of the intricacies involved, Justice Liman asserted that the plaintiff had a rightful claim to the amount sought as damage.
See also: Reps to invite Kyari, oil marketers over petrol price
Furthermore, the court rejected the arguments put forth by the defendant, Ecobank, emphasizing that the contents of the relevant document served as the best evidence and required no further elaboration.
Consequently, in his concluding remarks, Justice Liman left no room for ambiguity, stating, “I have no hesitation in granting reliefs in favor of the plaintiff.”
With this decisive statement, the court granted all four reliefs sought by Honeywell Flour Mills, cementing the company’s triumph in the legal dispute.
Justice Liman frowned at Ecobanks’s lawyer’s approach, stating that The purpose of an undertaking to pay damages has been held in a legion of cases to indemnify the party for the losses he may suffer on the bases of an ex parte order.
Note that Rule 4 of the Winding Up Rules provides that all applications which affect the rights of parties in a winding-up proceeding must be made on notice.
The provisions of the winding up rules are very clear and unambiguous. The defendant cannot claim ignorance of this provision as ignorance of the law is no excuse and it is even more inexcusable if it is committed by a lawyer. The ex parte application was therefore, made ultra vires.
See also: No conversation between CJN, Tinubu, says Supreme Court
Bode Olanipekun, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and legal counsel representing HFMP, expressed his agreement with the court’s findings and commended the thoroughness of the judgment.
He noted: It’s a commendable decision and precedent in an area of our jurisprudence that has been scarcely tested. The court has awarded damages in a claim brought on the premise of an undertaking given for the grant of ex parte orders, which both the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court have found were improperly sought and granted.
Back Story.
The Nation reports that the case dates back to 2015 when Ecobank obtained ex-parte orders to freeze the bank accounts of Honeywell Flour Mills under Suit Number FHC/L/CP/1689/2015.
However, over time, these orders were modified, initially granting HFMP limited access to its accounts. Following Honeywell Flour Mills’ appeal to the Court of Appeal, the ex-parte orders were set aside, restoring HFMP’s full account operations.
Dissatisfied with the Court of Appeal’s ruling, Ecobank pursued further legal recourse by filing an appeal at the Supreme Court.
However, the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal and clarified that ex-parte injunctions are not permissible in winding-up petitions.
Honeywell Claims.
In light of the damages suffered by HFMP during the asset freezing order and in accordance with Ecobank’s previous undertaking, HFMP filed a lawsuit seeking substantial damages in the amount of N72.2 billion.
The claims made by HFMP include losses due to foreign exchange devaluation, interest on unutilised cash balances, loss of revenue, and aggravated and exemplary damages.
Hon. Justice Liman’s judgment in the damages suit means Ecobank Nigeria is legally obligated to compensate HFMP with a sum of N 72.2 billion as a result of the damages caused.
In light of the damages suffered by HFMP during the asset freezing order and in accordance with Ecobank’s previous undertaking, HFMP filed a lawsuit seeking substantial damages in the amount of N72.2 billion.
The claims made by HFMP include losses due to foreign exchange devaluation, interest on unutilised cash balances, loss of revenue, and aggravated and exemplary damages.
Hon. Justice Liman’s judgment in the damages suit means Ecobank Nigeria is legally obligated to compensate HFMP with a sum of N 72.2 billion as a result of the damages caused.
